Monthly Archive for February, 2007

Professional background not matched in jobs

2138g2[1]1.gif

According to the Central Statistics Agency in the Netherlands (CBS), ethnic minorities are more likely to have jobs below their professional background than whites. The problem is largest with those having a University degree.

In the above chart ‘niet-westerse allochtonen’ are ethnic minorities and ‘autochtonen’ are whites. The chart starts at ‘basisonderwijs’ (elementary education) and ends with ‘wetenschappelijk’ (University).

The Central Statistics Agency did not look at the causes of these diferences, although many would suggest the differences could be partly explained by prejudice and discrimination.

Obama wouldn’t be first black president

Lincol3[1].jpg If elected, would Barack Hussein Obama be the first black president of the United States? Not so, according to Diversity Inc. Research shows at least five U.S. presidents had black ancestors and Thomas Jefferson, the nation’s third president, was considered the first black president, according to historian Leroy Vaughn, author of Black People and Their Place in World History.

Vaughn’s research shows Jefferson was not the only former black U.S. president. Who were the others? Andrew Jackson, Abraham Lincoln, Warren Harding and Calvin Coolidge. But why was this unknown? How were they elected president? All five of these presidents never acknowledged their black ancestry.

Jefferson, who served two terms between 1801 and 1809, was described as the “son of a half-breed Indian squaw and a Virginia mulatto father,” as stated in Vaughn’s findings. Jefferson also was said to have destroyed all documentation attached to his mother, even going to extremes to seize letters written by his mother to other people.

President Andrew Jackson, the nation’s seventh president, was in office between 1829 and 1837. Vaughn cites an article written in The Virginia Magazine of History that Jackson was the son of an Irish woman who married a black man. The magazine also stated that Jackson’s oldest brother had been sold as a slave.

Lincoln, the nation’s 16th president, served between 1861 and 1865. Lincoln was said to have been the illegitimate son of an African man, according to Leroy’s findings. Lincoln had very dark skin and coarse hair and his mother allegedly came from an Ethiopian tribe. His heritage fueled so much controversy that Lincoln was nicknamed “Abraham Africanus the First” by his opponents.

President Warren Harding, the 29th president, in office between 1921 and 1923, apparently never denied his ancestry. According to Vaughn, William Chancellor, a professor of economics and politics at Wooster College in Ohio, wrote a book on the Harding family genealogy. Evidently, Harding had black ancestors between both sets of parents. Chancellor also said that Harding attended Iberia College, a school founded to educate fugitive slaves.

Coolidge, the nation’s 30th president, served between 1923 and 1929 and supposedly was proud of his heritage. He claimed his mother was dark because of mixed Indian ancestry. Coolidge’s mother’s maiden name was “Moor” and in Europe the name “Moor” was given to all blacks just as “Negro” was used in America. It later was concluded that Coolidge was part black.

The only difference between Obama and these former presidents is that none of their family histories were fully acknowledged by others. Even though Obama is half-white, he strongly resembles his Kenyan father. And not only is Obama open about his ancestry, most people acknowledge him as a black man, which is why people will identify Obama, if elected, as the first black president of the United States.

Source: DiversityInc

Chinese and Indians outperform white British

Independent.JPG Children of Chinese origin have outperformed every other British group in English by the age of 11, according to an ethnic breakdown of exam and test results published yesterday, says the British Independent newspaper.

They have the best results of all ethnic groups in national curriculum tests at 11 with 86 per cent reaching the required standard. These figures include recent Chinese immigrants who do not have English as a first language. Schoolchildren of Indian origin come second with 85 per cent achieving the same standard - compared with 80 per cent of white British children.

Their success is carried through to GCSE level where 65.8 per cent of Chinese-origin pupils obtain five A*- to C-grade passes including maths and English - under the Department for Education and Skills’ new measure used to rank schools. Pupils of Indian origin also outperform the white British with a 59.1 per cent pass rate, compared to 44.3 per cent for white British pupils.

The figures are revealed in an analysis of last year’s GCSE and national curriculum test results for pupils aged seven, 11 and 14.

Girls outperform boys in all ethnic groups. Of all major etnic groups, Afro-Caribbeans, Pakistani and Bangladeshi underperform. Especially the performance of black boys is sparkling concerns. Fewer than one in four Afro-Caribbean boys (22.7 per cent) achieve five top-grade GCSE passes compared with 36 per cent of boys overall.

The breakdown follows an official report from the Department for Education and Skills, which drew attention to the exclusion rate for black Afro-Caribbean childeren - they were three times as likely to be excluded from school as white youngsters. Their rate of permament exclusions was four per 10,000 compared to 1,3 for white pupils. Again, Chinese-origin pupils had the lowest exclusion rate, with 0.2 per cent.

The analysis also showed that childern from better-off homes outperformed those pupils who received free shool meals: 61 per cent of those youngsters not in receipt of free school meals obtained five A*-to C-grade passes compared with 33% of those from deprived backgrounds.